Tinnitus Atlas
Tinnitus Atlas · Conservative and Pharmacological Management of Tinnitus · Module 09

9Other Drugs and Intratympanic Therapy

Betahistine, vasodilators, melatonin, NMDA-targeting agents and drugs delivered directly into the middle ear have all been tried for tinnitus. With one exception for sleep, the story is a sobering list of negative or absent evidence for the percept itself.

FBetahistine and vasodilators

Betahistine, a histamine analogue used for Meniere’s vertigo, is often prescribed for tinnitus on the assumption that improving inner-ear blood flow will quieten the sound. The Cochrane review by Wegner and colleagues tested this and found no good evidence that betahistine helps tinnitus, with side effects no different from placebo [2018].

The same logic underlies older vasodilators and rheological agents, and the same disappointment follows: the ‘poor circulation’ model of chronic subjective tinnitus is largely unsupported, and these drugs are not recommended for it [2014].

TTargeting glutamate: NMDA antagonists and the AM-101 trials

A more mechanistic line of attack targets glutamate excitotoxicity at the synapse between inner hair cells and auditory-nerve fibres, thought to drive aberrant firing in acute, cochlear-origin tinnitus. AM-101 (esketamine, an NMDA-receptor antagonist) was developed for intratympanic delivery to act locally on this synapse [2013].

An early phase II study suggested a signal in acute tinnitus [2014], but the larger confirmatory programme did not establish efficacy, and the drug has not entered practice. It is a clean illustration of a recurring pattern: promising mechanism, early hope, negative confirmation. Systemic NMDA antagonists such as memantine and acamprosate have likewise failed to show convincing benefit [2013].

Almost nothing helps the percept; some help the consequences

AgentEffect on perceptOther defensible use
BetahistineNo benefit (Cochrane)Meniere vertigo
VasodilatorsNo benefit
NMDA antagonist (AM-101, IT)Phase II signal; not confirmed
Memantine / acamprosateNo convincing benefit
Intratympanic steroidsWeak for chronic tinnitusSudden SNHL
IT / IV lidocaineTransient only / unsafe systemically
MelatoninIndirect at bestImproves sleep

Red = no benefit; amber = weak/transient; green = a genuinely useful indication elsewhere. Schematic.

TIntratympanic steroids and lidocaine

Delivering drug straight to the round window is attractive because it concentrates the agent at the cochlea while sparing the body. Intratympanic corticosteroids are established for sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and are sometimes given hoping to ease accompanying tinnitus — but for chronic isolated tinnitus the evidence of benefit on the percept is weak.

Intratympanic and intravenous lidocaine can transiently abolish tinnitus, a fascinating proof that the percept is modifiable, but the effect is brief and the systemic route risks arrhythmia, so it is not a practical treatment. A recent randomised study of topical intra-auricular lidocaine again showed only limited, short-lived effect [2025]. Across intratympanic approaches, the honest summary is short-lived or unproven benefit for the chronic percept.

How intratympanic delivery works

Ear canalTympanicmembraneMiddle-ear cavityNeedledrugRound windowCochlea (scala tympani)Concentrates drugat the cochleaSpares systemicexposureBut benefit on the chronictinnitus percept is weak / short-livedTried this way:corticosteroids,lidocaine,AM-101 (esketamine)

Drug placed in the middle ear diffuses across the round window to the cochlea. Schematic.

CMelatonin for sleep, not for silence

Melatonin is the one agent here with a defensible everyday role — but for sleep, not for the sound. Disturbed sleep is one of the most disabling consequences of tinnitus, and melatonin can improve sleep quality in tinnitus patients with relatively few side effects [2015].

Note the framing carefully: melatonin is treating the insomnia that tinnitus causes, and any reported easing of tinnitus is most plausibly downstream of better sleep and reduced fatigue. As with antidepressants, the principle holds — treat the treatable consequence honestly, and do not promise the patient that any of these drugs will switch the sound off, because the guideline-level evidence simply is not there [2014].

AM-101: from signal to negative confirmation

123

A plausible mechanism

Targets glutamate excitotoxicity at the inner-hair-cell / nerve synapse in ACUTE tinnitus.

Lesson: plausible mechanism + early hope does NOT equal proven treatment.

Step through the arc that many candidate tinnitus drugs follow. Schematic.

Case 6.9
A 39-year-old woman with chronic, stable, bilateral subjective tinnitus and normal hearing asks her ENT surgeon to 'inject something into the ear to cure the noise', having read online about intratympanic injections. She has no vertigo, no sudden hearing change, and no red flags. Her main current problem is that the tinnitus keeps her awake.

What is the most appropriate, evidence-based response?

Self-assessment — Module 93 questions
Question 1 · Trainee

What did the Cochrane review by Wegner and colleagues conclude about betahistine for tinnitus?

Question 2 · Trainee

Which best describes the AM-101 (esketamine) intratympanic programme for tinnitus?

Question 3 · Clinician

What is the most defensible role for melatonin in a tinnitus patient?

Tracked locally in your browser — see /progress for the dashboard.